in hoc † signo

Renewing the Dialectic on Modernism

In Common Sense, Culture of Death, Movies/Art on 15 July, 2010 at 8:49 am

I had the chance to sit down and talk with a skeptic friend this morning, and the following dialogue ensued:

1.  Why must you rail against Modernism?  Isn’t it just tilting at windmills, and aren’t we all postmoderns at this point?

Bernard, I applaud your “windmills” allusion to Don Quixote.  It is appropriate, insofar as  Cervantes wrote the first Modern novel — a paean to the pointlessness of virtue, the needlessness of war, the heedlessness of headlong masculine chivalry, etc.  I refer you to Lepanto.

First, what is Modernism?  This question is difficult to answer because part of the nature of what we call Modernism is that it has many heads and faces, like the chimeraPius X wrote that Modernism “presents its doctrines without order and systematic arrangement into one whole, scattered and disjointed one from another, so as to appear to be in doubt and uncertainty, while they are in reality firm and steadfast.”

Like the positive and negative terminals on a battery, two main poles provide Modernism with its energy:

1. Agnosticism.  This means that human reason is limited to the senses.  No more, no less.  Thou shalt not mention metaphysics, unless thou proceedest directly to phenomenology.  God is right out.

2. Vital immanence.  This means that the common religious urging felt by man is limited to and originates from him.  Hence, religion is only a movement of man’s heart, why or whence he knows not, and this we call sentiment.  Blech.

Now, we see these two aspects of Modernist philosophy storming the minds of the young on a daily basis.  Take for instance The Matrix.  When Morpheus tells Neo that there is a universal feeling everyone experiences “when you go to Church…when you pay your taxes,” he is telling Neo that 1) vital immanence is what causes any sort of transcendental yearning in man, and 2) his is merely a sensory existence, as evidenced by the ridiculous tubing apparatus through which man experiences the empirical reality known as the Matrix.  Cute metaphor for Modernism, no?

  1. Why must you rail against Modernism? Isn’t it just tilting at windmills, and aren’t we all postmoderns at this point?

    I don’t buy this at all. Postmoderns are actually fading fast. Looking at it from merely a rational and Darwinian perspective, progressive culture is fading so fast it could be called an implosion. Meanwhile, traditional locations are growing rapidly – Africa, Amish, Western Trads. Demography is destiny, and moderns look mighty sick these days.

    God is clever, but he is not malicious.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: